Fire Safety

Fire Safety (UK)

Here is some information about the Fire Safety Order 2005, which came into force on 1st October 2006. As from that date, old fire safety certificates cease to be effective and new regulations for running a fire safety assessment come into operation.

There is a website ( on which you will find information about the new regulations.

Halfway down the page there is an on-line self-assessment form you can fill in. I tried it and it takes about 10 minutes. You then submit this and immediately receive back a summary of your responses and more information about how to comply with the regulations.

There is also a link to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) site( If you scroll down this page you will find details of guides to the regulations for various types of building. Guide 6 – for small and medium places of assembly – will be the guide for most Buddhist Centre buldings. The guide is £12 or free to download from that site.

There may be exemption from some of the new fire regulations for religious residential communities i.e. less strict regulations apply than would in a strictly commercial property.

There is an “explanatory memorandum” which is accessible online at: .
On page 10, paragraph 46 there is the relevant clause which exempts religious communities. I’ve quoted the relevant text below.

Obviously we want our buildings to be as safe as possible, but some of the new regulations are very strict and could involve a lot of expense. So, it is worth investigating what your legal obligations are.


46. The Act itself exempts certain other HMOs from licensing requirements, namely those owned by the police, fire and rescue and health service bodies, those wherethe local authority or a registered social landlord has control, and HMOs occupied principally for the purposes of a religious community (except certain blocks of flats that were not converted in accordance with relevant building regulations).

Retreat Centres:
When a fire officer visited Padmaloka he was happy to classify it as a residential property (which meant less stringent requirements). He made a few monir recommendations, which Padmaloka were happy to implement. The reason for the re-classification was that Padmaloka is not a hotel or a hostel – they are closer to a monastery because they have a number of people who live there, some of the ‘teachers’ having lived there for quite a number of years. They also don’t charge people a flat cost when they go there – they have a rate they ask for but also are happy to negotiate reductions and also for people to come sometimes for free. Maybe some of the other retreat centres fall into a similar category? Samudradka is happy if other retreat centres want to contact him at Padmaloka about this.

Comments are closed.